Can the Brain Be Rebooted to Stop Drug Addiction?

Posted on 2008-04-14

Scientists for the first time have identified long-term changes in mice brains that may shed light on why addicts get hooked on drugs—in this case methamphetamines—and have such a tough time kicking the habit. The findings, reported in the journal Neuron, could set the stage for new ways to block cravings—and help addicts dry out.

Researchers, using fluorescent tracer dye, discovered that mice given methamphetamines for 10 days (roughly equivalent to a human using it for two years) had suppressed activity in a certain area of their brains. Much to their surprise, normal function did not return even when the drug was stopped, but did when they administered a single dose of it again after the mice had been in withdrawal.

Study co-author Nigel Bamford, a pediatric neurologist at the University of Washington School of Medicine, says that if similar changes occur in humans, it will indicate that an effective way to fight addiction may be to design therapies that target the affected area—the striatum, a forebrain region that controls movement but also has been linked to habit-forming behavior.

Previous research has shown that the drug stimulates nerve cells in the midbrain to release dopamine into the synapses (connections between neurons) in the striatum. Dopamine (which is connected to reward processing, motivation and attention) is one of the brain's primary neurotransmitters, the chemical messengers by which one neuron triggers its neighbor to fire a nerve impulse.

In this case, Bamford says, the excess dopamine affected the flow of information from the cortex (the brain's central processing unit) to the striatum. Specifically, it appeared to partially block nerve cells in the cortex from releasing glutamate, another neurotransmitter, which is responsible for excitation. "Dopamine provides a filtering effect that may help you concentrate on the novel object or pleasurable stimulus," Bamford says. Too much could explain addictive or compulsive behavior, because it would help a user ignore other things and focus a lot of attention on one particular goal.

Researchers found that chronic use of the drug kept the brain in this state of "chronic depression," in essence suppressing the neural terminals controlling the flow of signals between the cortex and striatium—even after a long period of several weeks. But normal activity resumed after the drug was reintroduced.

Bamford believes the key lies in other neurons found in the striatum, which release the neurotransmitter acetylcholine that, he says, acts like a "memory switch". When dopamine is released by meth use, it lessens acetylcholine levels in the striatum; continued drug use reduces it to as low as 10 percent. This decrease, in turn, affects glutamate levels, which also drop perilously low, thereby resulting in the chronic depression of information flow in the brain.

When methamphetamine is administered after a period of withdrawal, however, the dopamine released by the midbrain neurons has the opposite effect on the acetylcholine cells, prompting them to release the chemical into the striatum. This, in turn, stimulates the production of glutamate, somehow causing the system to reset itself to a pre-addictive state.

Bamford says that if researchers can pinpoint the resetting mechanism, it would enable them to design nonaddictive drugs to trigger it.

"The identification of this quite complicated mechanism gives you different opportunities to address the root of the problem so the synapse can be renormalized without the use of the psychostimulant," he says. "A better target would be to determine how these [acetylcholine neurons] are learning to stay depressed and work directly with those."

 

Courtesy:  www.sciam.com

The World Bank: World Hunger Growing

Posted on 2008-04-14

World Bank President Robert Zoellick says the escalating price of food is stunting opportunities and creating hardship for people in poor countries.  The international lending organization says it aims to double agricultural business investment this year and called on rich countries to help offset the rising cost of food.  Speaking to reporters ahead of the World Bank/IMF meetings this weekend, Zoellick said World Bank members must step up efforts to stave off what he called a "growing emergency" in developing cou

World Bank President Robert Zoellick

World Bank President Robert Zoellic

ntries. VOA's Mil Arcega reports.

The World Bank says Sub-Saharan countries will be among the hardest hit by the skyrocketing cost of food.  Speaking to reporters on Thursday, World Bank President

Robert Zoellick says the situation in the world's poorest countries makes the financial problems in developed nations seem trivial in comparison.

"While many are worrying about filling their gas tanks, many others around the world are struggling to fill their stomachs - and it's getting more and more difficult everyday,” he said.

World Bank studies show the price of wheat has more than doubled in the past year, while the price of rice has risen at least 75 percent.

"In Bangladesh, a two kilogram bag of rice like this now consumes about half of the daily income of a poor family,”  said Zoellick.

Zoellick says the upcoming spring meetings by members of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank must do more than recognize the crisis.  He called on rich countries to act quickly to expand safety net programs for poor nations and provide at least $500 million to meet their emergency food needs.

"This is not just about meals foregone today or about increasing social unrest.  This is about lost learning potential for children and adults in the future - stunted intellectual and physical growth.  Even more, we estimate that the effects of this food crisis on poverty reduction worldwide is on the order of seven lost years," he added.

Food riots have already erupted in developing nations where people spend as much as 60 percent of their income on food.  The U.N. and World Bank blame the rising cost of food on a combination of factors including climate change, higher energy prices and the growing demand for biofuels.

 

Courtesy: www.voanews.com 

 

Dog and his owner

Posted on 2008-04-14

An amazing story. Sam, a 2 1/2 year old dachshund, was devoted to his owner, Teddy Crockarell. When Crockerell died of cancer last Monday, Sam seemed to immediately run away.

This despite the fact that he had an electric fence collar, which he had never ignoreed before. In fact, Sam had never left his home by himself before.

Two and a half days later, the family arrived at a church, over six miles from their home, for Crockerells funeral - and discovered Sam was waiting for them.

Marcene Crockarell said, "He was just shivering and sitting there by the doors. We just lost it and all we were doing was hollering, 'Sam! Sam!' and here he comes and he was just all over all three of us."

"If he walked those six miles he was looking for his papa... but he found him, and that's what's good about this whole situation, he found him and he found his way back here," said Marcene Crockarell's son-in-law Howard.

 Watch a video report.

 


Will Obama Pay for 'Bitter' Flap?

Posted on 2008-04-14

Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama

 After the last few days that he endured over his controversial comments about "bitter" small-town America, Barack Obama can only hope that the Pope's arrival in Washington on Tuesday steals some of the spotlight. But given the hits he took from both the Clinton and McCain campaigns over his questionable choice of words, that may be too much of a miracle to ask for.

The entire weekend campaign news cycle was dominated by the fallout from a grainy and sometimes inaudible tape leaked to the website the Huffington Post, on which Obama can be heard lamenting to a closed San Francisco fundraiser the plight of rural Americans. "You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

To many observers, the timing couldn't have been worse, with the remarks seeming to insult the very crowd Obama has been courting in Pennsylvania ahead of its key primary next Tuesday. Polls have shown that in nearly every state save for Wisconsin Clinton has won the white working class vote, moderate swing voters sometimes called Reagan Democrats; her advantage in that demographic helped Clinton win Ohio by 10.5 percentage points. "Obama used the word "bitter" when he should have said "frustrated," said Donna Brazile, an undecided Super Delegate who ran Al Gore's presidential campaign in 2000. "Clearly Obama's comments were "unartful," but not inaccurate. Polls show most voters are dissatisfied with the current direction of the country. And politicians have always played on their fears—and used issues like crime, welfare, gay rights and abortion—to draw distinctions without addressing the deep issues that voters care about."

Up until the "bitter" controversy, Obama had been gaining in the polls in Pennsylvania. He started March down more than 20 points but in recent days had eked away Clinton's lead to just 7.3%, according to an average of Pennsylvania polls by the non-partisan website Real Clear Politics. It remains to be seen whether the reaction to the statements will actually effect the polls or simply serve as fodder for the punditocracy. But the comments could potentially help Clinton not only in Pennsylvania, but also with winning over undecided super delegates who might otherwise be reluctant to go against the popular will of the voters. "These comments, and the larger issue of the Obama campaign's inability to connect with these working class voters, is not a little thing. It's a big thing. And it's a big thing that is likely to end up making a big difference in November," Clinton's new chief strategist Geoff Garin said in an interview with the blog Talking Points Memo."

Clinton herself, along with GOP presumptive nominee John McCain, were quick to latch on to Obama's comments as "elitist", "condescending" and "out of touch." Clinton has mentioned the gaffe at every event she's had all weekend, and her surrogates have picked up the drum beat across the country. "As I travel around Pennsylvania, I meet people who are resilient, who are optimistic, who are positive, who are rolling up their sleeves," Clinton said Friday. "Pennsylvanians don't need a president who looks down on them, they need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families."

Obama tried his best to repair the damage quickly. "I didn't say it as well as I could have," Obama told a crowd in Muncie, Indiana Saturday. Later that same day he told a North Carolina newspaper: "Obviously, if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that." At the same time, Obama refused to repudiate his words, seeking instead to clarify them. "People end up- they don't vote on economic issues because they don't expect anybody's going to help them," Obama said. "So people end up, you know, voting on issues like guns, and are they going to have the right to bear arms. They vote on issues like gay marriage. And they take refuge in their faith and their community and their families and things they can count on. But they don't believe they can count on Washington."

"I thought his response in Indiana, in which he reemphasized the point he was making rather than apologize or "clarify" it, was sensible and refreshing," said Thomas Mann, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. Though the first wave of criticism focused on Obama's use of the word "bitter," over the weekend critics concentrated more on Obama's use of the word "cling" and the negative connotation it gave to people's attachments to guns and God. "I think you're on dangerous ground when you morph that into suggesting that people's cultural values, whether its religion or hunting and fishing or concerns about trade, are premised solely upon those of kind of anxieties and don't have a legitimate foundation independent of them," Indiana Senator Evan Bayh told reporters while campaigning for Clinton in Indiana, which also holds its primary on May 6.

Last month Obama came under fire for comments made by his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright from the pulpit over the years, including calling on his parish to "God damn America," and labeling the country the "U.S. of KKK A." Obama responded with an eloquent speech on race and the furor died down. This time, though, giving an intellectual speech is not going to easily solve the problem. Either way, Obama is going to have to find a way to speak to working class white voters, if not before the Pennsylvania primary on April 22, than certainly in the general election if he's the nominee.

"Mistakes become "gaffes" when they play to an underlying stereotype," said Michael Munger, a polticial science professor at Duke University in North Carolina, which is scheduled to hold its primary May 6. "If Bill Clinton had said this thing about some white people being bitter and using guns, it would have been fine, since he grew up a poor white guy. But the Obama stereotype is a wealthy ivy-league elitist. He's a little too well-spoken; his suits are a little too expensive. From him, the comment comes off as condescending."

But if Clinton, and McCain for that matter, are going to use these comments to cast Obama as an arrogant elitist, they better be prepared to deal with the blowback. As Jamal Simmons, a Democratic consultant and Obama supporter, put it in an email exchange with TIME, "Hillary Clinton calls Barack Obama elitist? Really? Hillary Clinton was a

corporate lawyer who sat on the Wal Mart board before becoming First Lady and is now worth over $100 million. Barack Obama is the child of a single mother raised in part by his grandparents who went to school on a scholarship and was a community organizer making $12,000 a year before becoming a law professor, lawyer and state senator. Five years ago he was still paying off student loans. It's a bogus charge."

 

Courtesy: Time Magazine

MQM chief quits, withdraws resignation within 60 minutes

Posted on 2008-04-12

Following immense pressure from within the MQM and demands to review his decision to step down as party chief, MQM founder Altaf Hussain withdrew his resignation about an hour after he announced it, saying that he was prepared to offer unconditional friendship to PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif.

“Even if Nawaz chooses to curse at me, I offer him my unconditional friendship,” he told several hundred MQM supporters, leaders and Rabita Committee members on Friday at the MQM headquarters Nine-Zero, Geo News reported. “I am even prepared to join the PML-N to keep the peace,” he added.

Addressing the meeting by telephone, the MQM chief said that the MQM Legal Aid Committee had been targeted.

Criticises: Altaf said that the committee members had been staging a peaceful demonstration, but opponent lawyers attacked them without provocation. “After the violent riots erupted in Karachi, I asked Rabita Committee members and representatives to quit their work and restore peace in the city,” he said. “This city belongs to all and everybody is responsible for keeping law and order here,” he said.

Earlier, Altaf Hussain had announced that he was stepping down as party chief in protest against his party leadership’s inability to contain the April 9 violence in Karachi.

 

Courtesy: Daily Times

 

Altaf’s 4th resignation since Jan 2007

KARACHI: Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) chief Altaf Hussain’s announcement of resignation as the party head on Friday was his fourth since January 2007. The last time he announced resignation was in July 2007. On January 5, 2007, Altaf had announced his resignation citing deteriorating health as the reason. According to the MQM’s website, he was displeased with the extravagant lifestyle of party leaders. He took back his resignation the same day, after workers pressed him to reconsider his decision. An MQM member said Hussain had also considered resigning in March 2007. He announced resignation again on June 11, 2007, again citing health problems, while addressing a gathering of supporters by telephone. In 2005, he offered to quit six times, for similar reasons. irfan ali

 

Courtesy: Daily Times

 

Losing the police plot?

Posted on 2008-04-12

IRONICALLY, civilians and the police make strange, if not estranged, bedfellows. To be fair, several reasons keep this relationship at odds but the abject indigence of the force remains the real culprit. Where routine police excesses have robbed the public of all faith in their custodians, the authorities have made negligible efforts to address the woes of the force. Instead, burdensome additions are introduced in the name of security. One of these is Karachi’s Muhafiz force which, established some eight months ago, is far from honouring its promise of vigilance. Its performance is hardly the stuff of urban legend and the force only has a few arrests and an encounter with a fugitive to its name. Police high-ups of the time had hoped that the visibility of Muhafiz vehicles would serve as tools of deterrence for miscreants. However, street crime statistics tell a different story and do not endorse the force as an able prevention mechanism. According to a report in this newspaper, its 600 personnel were extracted from the notorious Sindh Reserve Force with a few exceptions from various police stations. Therefore, its origins are reason enough for consternation. Second, the training of Muhafiz personnel leaves much to be desired, including weapons training. Third, its fuel allowances are ridiculously low which curtails free movement and the absence of a designated Muhafiz police station makes the force reliant on regular police points.

The government would have done well to have used the funds earmarked for over 50 Muhafiz mobiles in the city and other technical support to strengthen existing law enforcement personnel. There are grave issues — lack of incentives in the way of pay raises, decent living quarters, training, and promotions that are judged on merit by established panels — that create police apathy which is detrimental to the citizenry. Also, our police force is riddled with political appointments that discourage neutrality. The fact that the metropolis is not home to a majority of its law enforcers translates into a detached force and promotes police crimes. Superfluities such as the Muhafiz force will not tame Karachi. But an indigenous, professional, compensated police force comprising native recruits is more likely to become the long-needed harness.

Courtesy: Daily Dawn

Need for a strategy

Posted on 2008-04-12

IN his review of the current state of the national economy, federal Finance Minister Ishaq Dar made two important points about putting the economy back on the right track and rectifying the widening budgetary and current account imbalances. It hardly needs to be emphasised that the economic agenda should be the government’s first priority given the hardship people are facing. Rising food and energy prices have fuelled inflation which was at an all-time high of 14.12 per cent in March. Mr Dar said the new coalition would have to take some harsh steps in the next 75 days of the current financial year to restrict the fiscal deficit — which threatens to balloon to nine per cent of GDP — to the manageable level of six per cent. The proposed measures include one or more hikes in domestic oil prices and rationalisation of taxes. He did not say how the coalition planned to shield lower-income groups from the negative impact of further increases in oil prices. The issue of rationalisation of taxes was also left unexplained.

The second point he made was that the government would seek to arrange $2.5bn from external sources to shore up the country’s dwindling foreign exchange reserves. But he did not elaborate whether the government intended to raise the present stock of foreign exchange by seeking assistance from multilateral donors or by bringing fresh foreign investment, or pursuing some other strategy. One doesn’t have the slightest clue how the economy or the common man will be affected if the government fails to arrange this amount.

The remaining part of the minister’s briefing was mostly devoted to criticism of the previous PML-Q and caretaker governments and their mishandling of the country’s finances, and a repetition of what we already have learnt from the State Bank’s last report on the performance of the economy during the first half of this year. The previous PML government and the caretakers were accused of presenting an inaccurate picture of the true health of the economy. The SBP too has stated so in its last report.

The minister also promised accountability of the economic managers of the previous government, including former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz, through the Senate’s Finance Committee and the new Public Accounts Committee for bringing the economy to this critical point. Will this principle of accountability apply to those who are going to manage the economy from now onwards? It would have been much better if Mr Dar had told us about the steps the new government might be contemplating — if it is indeed thinking along these lines — to make the processes of economic policy formulation and budget making really transparent through wide-ranging debates in parliament and the media to ensure that the finance ministry baboos do not dare fudge figures to show growth when there is none.

Free media bill tabled

Posted on 2008-04-12

ISLAMABAD, April 11: The new government on Friday brought a bill to the National Assembly to kill a draconian gag imposed by President Pervez Musharraf on the country’s nascent electronic media under the state of emergency imposed in November that provoked an international outcry.

The Pakistan Electronic Media Authority (Amendment) Bill, introduced by Information and Broadcasting Minister Ms Sherry Rehman on the second day of the first regular session of the lower house, will automatically go to a standing committee for scrutiny before being sent back to the house for passage, possibly very soon.

It came as the first legislative step of Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani’s 12-day-old coalition cabinet for the promised undoing of the remnants of the president’s Nov 3, 2007 extra-constitutional emergency he imposed in his later-abandoned position of army chief and used also to suspend the Constitution for 42 days of its enforcement and sack about 60 judges of superior courts.

But the move could raise questions about the need to take a legislative path to undo an offshoot of the emergency that the coalition parties do not recognise as legitimate, particularly in respect of the removal of the judges they have vowed to restore merely through a National Assembly resolution within 30 days of the formation of their government.

Most of the deposed judges had lost their jobs for refusing to take a fresh oath under a Provisional Constitution Order (PCO).

At a press conference, Ms Rehman did not agree with the view that a Nov 3 presidential ordinance that made changes in the original Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) Ordinance of 2002 had expired or become ineffective and said the decree had been protected by the approval of the emergency by the post-Nov 3 Supreme Court. She said another bill would be brought later to undo an emergency decree affecting the print media.

The Pemra used the Nov 3 decree to keep major private television and radio channels off the air in Pakistan for varying durations from a week to more than a month, bar live coverage of events even during the campaign for the Feb 18 elections and ban some popular programmes and their hosts at the pain of cancellation of operating licences or punishments such as imprisonment and fine.

These move led to worldwide protests by governments and human rights and media watchdog organisations.

Though the private channels have ignored most of these restrictions after the new government came into being, the new bill will undo the Nov 3 decree altogether after the draft is passed by the National Assembly and the Senate and formally assented to by the president.

The bill seeks to withdraw:

-- Provision that made the owner of an offending broadcast station or cable network responsible along with the operator.

-- Increase of the limit of fine for contravening Pemra laws from Rs1 million to Rs10 million.

-- Pemra’s power to revoke a licence.

-- Powers given to the Pemra and its chairman to seize equipment or seal the premises of a licensee in a situation of emergency.

-- Prohibition of live coverage of violence and conflict.

-- Provisions for three-year imprisonment for a broadcast licencee or representative (in addition to Rs10 million fine) and one-year imprisonment on a cable operator representative (in addition to Rs5 million fine) for committing or abetting violation of Pemra laws.

-- Provisions making offences under the Pemra law cognizable and compoundable.

Ms Rehman said that the PDA government was committed to implement its legislative agenda and that the repeal of Nov 3 amendments to the Pemra law was the first step in that direction.

She said the cabinet would take up all issues and hopefully the process of reinstatement of deposed judges would be set in motion with the setting up of parliamentary committees next week.

Asked whether the presidency would not be annoyed by the repeal of Pemra laws, she said the PPP-led government was committed to bring changes that would fit in democratic values without caring about annoying anyone.

Answering a query on whether the coalition government had accepted the Nov 3 changes in the Constitution as legal by bringing the repeal of changes in the Pemra law to parliament, she said this question would be addressed in the coming days but that the government was determined to change the controversial code of conduct for media which was enforced as result of Nov 3 emergency.

She said the ordinance pertaining to the print media would also be taken up for repeal and that the issue was likely to be submitted in the next cabinet meeting for approval.

Referring to an ambiguity about who was responsible for the closure of some television channels in Karachi the other day, she said cable operators had admitted they were asked to do so but they were not ready to disclose by whom.

She said no cable operator would in future close any channel without assigning explicit reasons or it would be liable to receive a show-cause notice.

Asked about possible changes in the bureaucracy, she said the new government did not believe in witch-hunting and would not disturb any official abiding by laws and ready to accept its commands.

She, however, said a special audit of all the operations would soon take place in order to fix responsibility of any wrongdoings in the previous government.

The National Assembly on Friday also began a debate on shortage of power in the country before being adjourned until 4pm on Monday.

Pakistan - Kevin Drum

Posted on 2008-04-12

By Kevin Drum

I see that Fred Kagan has a long piece up at National Reviewbunch of defeatist appeasers like Neville Chamberlain.
That’s a fresh approach, isn’t it? And it doesn’t get much better from
there. It’s mostly a phoned-in mishmash of straw men, race-baiting,
appeals to cultural solidarity (against the “hyper-sophisticates” who
oppose the war), chest thumping, semantic games, and, despite its
title, virtually no attempt to tell us “Why Iraq Matters.” arguing (surprise!) that liberals who want to withdraw from Iraq are a

However, credit where it’s due: Kagan does make one good point. At
the very end of the piece he takes on the argument that Iraq is a
distraction from the real war on terror:

Considering
[] that there are very few and very small al-Qaeda bases in
Afghanistan, that al-Qaeda in South Asia is mostly in Pakistan, and
that none of those insisting that the U.S. abandon Iraq to fight the
“real” enemy in Afghanistan have proposed any meaningful plans for
dealing with Chitral and Waziristan where that “real” enemy actually is
[...] how, exactly, is Iraq a distraction from the war on terror?

Now,
as it happens, I think most of us hyper-sophisticates believe that Iraq
is more than just a distraction from fighting al-Qaeda and the Taliban
in Afghanistan and Pakistan. There’s a much broader argument here about
the effective use of American military power that Kagan ignores. Still,
he’s got a point about Pakistan. That is where al-Qaeda is
mostly holed up these days, and no one — not liberals, not
conservatives, not anyone — really has any bright ideas about how to
root them out. Long story short, it’s not clear if the U.S. military
could do it even if we wanted them to, and in any case, no one wants to
start a war with Pakistan.

Obviously this isn’t a reason to stay in Iraq. If anything, it’s yet
another demonstration of the limits of military force. Still, it’s a
good question: what should we do about al-Qaeda in Pakistan? Nobody ever seems to want to talk very concretely about that.

Courtesy: Washington Mothly/Kevin Drum

Collective Failure

Posted on 2008-04-12

acts of violence in Karachi
especially the death of several people in arson have overshadowed the
events of the earlier two days. Dr Arbab Rahim and Dr Sher Afgan Niazi were
roughed up in shameful incidents. The reaction assumed a grave dimension when
two groups of lawyers clashed in
Karachi and the
city was gripped by terrorism of the worst kind. Somebody locked the gates of a
building housing a lawyer’s office before setting it on fire to ensure that the
object of his hatred did not escape certain death. No party can now claim that
its conduct has been impeccable. Worse still, the political atmosphere of
goodwill and bonhomie that the country was experiencing just a week ago has
dissipated overnight. The MQM has announced an indefinite boycott of the Sindh
Assembly, with the PML-Q following suit. This means all sides the victors
of the Feb 18 vote and those outside the grand alliance are one way or the
other willing actors in the sordid drama that is being enacted. As was to be
expected, the blame game is in full swing.

This is something that has to stop before it is too late. The situation has now
reached a stage where individuals do not count; at stake is the fate of the
democratic process itself that began with such hope and fervour only a few
weeks ago. While we hate to sound pessimistic, we cannot but express our
profound concern over what appears to be the political leaderships failure to
exercise control over their cadres and supporters. It is now clear that while a
dialogue between the top leadership of political parties is important to forge
a broad understanding on power-sharing and consensus on policy directions, this
spirit of accommodation must trickle down to the party’s rank and file.
Politics cannot be held hostage to the vengeful approach and hatred of party
workers many of whom have a personal axe to grind. One cannot condone the
leaderships of different parties for not taking their workers to task for acts
of violence which appeared indiscriminate.

In this situation, the role of the electronic media will also come under
scrutiny. In Karachi, where
commuters have to travel long distances to reach home, Wednesday’s incidents
were localised, but some TV channels conveyed the impression that the entire
city was up in flames. This was not the case, and within a surprisingly short
time the situation had normalised. Again, the parties have not helped by
allowing their leaders of all ranks to address televised press
conferences round the clock or sending them to speak on television where they
indulge in slanging matches that help no one. On the contrary, they only
provoke their party workers and cause despair among others when they should be
exercising restraint.

Courtesy: Daily Dawn

Created with ShoutPost

Archives